Paper Rejected After Minor Revision

If the manuscript sent back for a minor revision, they might be handled by Subject Area Editors. 201401221918 PK t”Æ?, ' PK ñ{†D content. This is the first report of injury (FROI) that an employer submits when an employee has a claim. Rejection after peer review: Dealing with this is a key skill required of any academic. After another round of substantial reviews and revision, the paper was accepted in NAR. Major revision and 4. This usually takes 1-3 days. Finally, the numerical example (Sect. Then I showed the editor's letter to my advisor. In that case the paper will be rejected, if it ever comes back in the first place. Thu, Sep 03, 2020 - 7:49 PM. So the review, in which…. Many things are common between me and this post. Authors should submit back their revisions within 1 month in the case of minor revision, 3 months in the case of major revision, and 4 months in the case of de novo resubmission. 5 & Earlier Revision History. 00 and couldn't figure that out. He took his inspiration from a senior postdoc in his lab who, after getting a rejection for. Authors should promptly act on the feedbacks from reviewers if a revision-type decision (Major Revision Required or Minor Revision Required) is recommended. There are two types of revisions: major or minor. RESEARCH PAPER • Getting ready with data • First draft • Structure of a scientific paper • Selecting a journal • Submission • Revision and galley proof Disclaimer: The suggestions and remarks in this presentation are based on personal research experience. The Secretary of State’s Office requires county clerks — through bipartisan teams of election judges — to physically find a specific number of ballots and check those paper results against the votes tabulated by the computers. Some of Salmond's supporters have claimed the documentary was an attempt to retry him after he had been acquitted. this is ourprimary mission !!!!!. 12 Cutting and Pasting 3. Applying it to published works (programs, recordings on a disk or in a file, books on paper or in a file), whose nature is to last indefinitely and which can be run, played or read any number of times, is stretching the word so far that it snaps. The first sentence tells readers that you grew tired after dinner. Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. But make sure you have a list of three or four other journals that it is also. 9% of papers in our study). Minor revision: This is equivalent to conditional accept. Reviewers decide whether a paper admitted to the review process is to be rejected, resubmitted or accepted by filling in the evaluation form. Accept as is, with minor editorial corrections if needed b. Environmental History. Additionally, it is not possible to predict the fate of a paper based on the acceptance rates for a specific journal. In addition, when work is done, you can use your 14-30-day revision period, so that a writer will look into the final draft once again and make all the needed changes. Rejection of seminal Works by then unknown economists. The submitted conference papers are subject to double blind peer review. In addition to accept and reject decisions, papers may be provided with “minor revision” decisions, in which case the paper is conditionally accepted and an assigned shepherd will verify if the. Here again this paper was rejected several times before being accepted. Setting and participants 117 200 women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of female nurses in the United States. Accept: Papers in this category will be accepted for publication in the proceedings and presentation at the conference, possibly after making minor changes with the oversight of a shepherd. " You may consider offering incentives to students who volunteer (such as extra credit points). It was submitted to a second-tier eye journal, after being rejected from a top-tier diabetes journal. 4 261-269 1998 McGann, Jerome Radiant Textuality: literature after the World Wide Web Palgrave New York 2001 Schreibman, Susan Kumar, Amit McDonald, Jarom The Versioning Machine Literary and Linguistic Computing 18. Government and Politics A-Level revision (AS and A2 Politics) section looking at Conservatism, Conservatism in Practice, Conservative Theory, Democratic Theory, Democratic Theory in Practice, Ecologism Theory, Electoral Systems & Referenda, Feminism Theory, Liberalism Theory, Liberalism in Practice, Nationalism Theory, Nationalism in Practice, Political Parties, Power, Authority & Legitimacy. Online medical coding solutions: TCI SuperCoder’s easy CPT®, HCPCS, & ICD-10 lookup, plus crosswalks, CCI, MPFS, specialty coding publications & webinars. Effective June 1, 2014, all first reports of injury (FROI) for injuries occurring after April 1, 1997 must be filed electronically via EDI unless they qualify for one of two exceptions. When Corlett had a paper rejected recently, it "made me more motivated to get it right," he says. Case 2: possible for you to submit your revision by this date,. 6) is particularly well-suited for illustrating the practical benefits of the approach. Research practices and approaches vary. About the early civilizations, the Apostle Paul, in Romans 1-3, states that they were created with a clear knowledge of God, but having rejected and twisted what truth they did possess, they worshipped the creature rather than the Creator. CRE revision notes. Not employ minors under 16 in door-to-door sales activity before 7 a. ! Examples: ! If you find 0 critical defect, 17 major defects and 12 minor defects, the products are rejected. By the end of the suite. After submission of the very minor revision (changes only in 10 sentence) and proofreading, I have got this mail from the new Editor-in-Chief after 10 month that our paper got rejected based on. The paper had three reviews, all good. My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. The paper was rejected. Some journals automatically send out everything to be reviewed by other scholars. 201401221918 PK t”Æ?, ' PK ñ{†D content. Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: Enclosed is our latest version of MS #85-02-22-RRRRR, that is, the re-re-re-revised version of our paper. To be revised (major revision): preprints that you have to revise and resubmit from your Author pages. Because they don’t trust exit polls as a measure of vote count accuracy, they don’t accept my conclusion. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. Authors have shown it using formula (2. This is one of the best situation. In my last post I wrote that I was having problems with motivation, which was true. Create a Google Doc version of your essay. Satisfaction guarantee. CRE Notes pdf;☆☛ Christian Religious Education Questions and Answers. In very few cases, a manuscript may be accepted for publication on first reading, with only minor revisions required. How do articles get peer reviewed? What role does peer review play in scholarly research and publication? This video will explain. There are two types of revisions: major or minor. Journal editors will often send a ‘rejection’ email that also includes an option to re-submit (‘we would consider a revised version of this paper if you are able to take the comments of the reviewers into account’). If the manuscript sent back for a minor revision, they might be handled by Subject Area Editors. As I leaned back and rested my head against the top of the chair, my eyelids began to feel heavy, and the edges of the empty plate in front of me blurred with the white tablecloth. Why repeated signatures are obtained on claim form in case there is minor difference in signatures with. In addition to the great instructions above, you can also edit the revision number in the "Version" box (after doing the above). 2%) requested a revision. Hitler’s Peace Offers, 1933- 1939 Foreword. When Corlett had a paper rejected recently, it "made me more motivated to get it right," he says. Ton of Options for Nonstop Ping, Advanced Timeout Features, Stop After # of Pings NS16_135. The Revised/Rejected Paper Editing service is for you if you are looking forward to meeting any of the below objectives:. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer’s recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, require major revision, need minor revision, or accepted. After the reviews are complete, dispositions may include "rejection without further submission," "rejection with an opportunity to resubmit," "major revision without a promise of acceptance," "minor revision," "acceptance subject to minor revision," or "outright acceptance. Triumph’s new Tiger 900 Rally Pro is 2020’s middleweight adventure bike boss. They might say, as one editor did to me, that after reflection (and reviewing) the paper doesn't really fit our format. Conditional acceptance with minor revision: These articles are usually published if the revisions have been made. In its petition, Red Bull. o The Government will then make contract award to the firm whose proposal offers the best. BIRMINGHAM: Detectives in Britain’s second city of Birmingham on Sunday launched a hunt for a knifeman who killed one and critically injured two in a series of random stabbings over several hours. We agree with the classification of the paper as Level III evidence. They wrote an interesting paper that I just came across titled, "How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists. By the end of the suite. HOWEVER, an editor can say: "I reject this paper, but you should go through a major revision and submit a new/different paper. 9 Signatures and Dates 3. When an editor sends a paper back for major revisions, it means they think it may be suitable for their journal after quite a lot more work. When I go back to a paper after 6 months to a year, I find all sorts of things that can be clearer. A simple revision of the paper to address referees’ comments. The Code of Federal Regulations is prima facie evidence of the text of the original documents (44 U. In a Twitter post, Christopher McEleny, an SNP councillor, branded the programme a "documentary that omitted the defence evidence and attempted a retrial by TV by only presenting the side the jury rejected". How a person can claim prize money? Answer: Prize money can be claimed/ availed by person he/she himself/ herself on fulfilling of prescribed claim Form available at Help Desk. The authors may choose to revise and resubmit a rejected paper, however there is no guarantee that the same board members or reviewers will be assigned. Moreover, in the time between first submission and last revision, I wrote four new papers in the same line, and insights from those permeate back to this one. TMHP is a group of contractors under the leadership of Accenture. The contents of the Federal Register are required to be judicially noticed (44 U. Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for Journal of Applied Physics. So, I said in my submission letter that it had been rejected by Science. All research articles, review articles, case reports, and case series published in Hindawi journals undergo full peer review by independent academic editors and reviewers. Any revision in length by more than 10% should be a major revision. A paper will be judged to be a resubmit (as opposed to a new submission) if the paper is from the same or similar authors, and a reviewer could write a substantially similar summary of the paper compared with the original submission. com and give me “edit” privileges so I can comment. I grew tired after dinner. Thanks for sharing. My paper on exit polls was rejected by the first peer review. Rejection of a Paper: There are many reasons to reject a paper. We agree with the classification of the paper as Level III evidence. Manuscripts are screened for plagiarism before, during, and after publication, and if found they will be rejected at any stage of processing. Write the following line after the end tag of gridview: Posted by Unknown at 4:22 AM No comments: Saturday, August 22, 2009. The review process may take approximately three months to be completed. LegalZoom is the nation's leading provider of personalized, online legal solutions and legal documents for small businesses and families. A Research Advance might use a new technique or a different experimental design to generate results that build upon the conclusions of the original research by, for example, providing new. Additionally, it is not possible to predict the fate of a paper based on the acceptance rates for a specific journal. How Are the Mighty Fallen- Rejected Classic Articles - Free download as PDF File (. military filing on your own behalf, you cannot currently file your Form N-600 online. 2019] Where, after an appeal has been filed and before decision by the Board, an applicant withdraws the appeal after the period for reply to the final rejection has expired, the application is to be considered abandoned as of the date on which the appeal was withdrawn unless there are allowed claims in the case. 0 In 1711 a law was passed in Pennsylvania prohibiting the importation of slaves, but it was rejected by the Council in England. Outright rejection can be recommended if the paper has following flaws-serious flaws in clinical report,-incorrect interpretation of data,-extensive plagiarism,-organizational or English usage flaws that prevent critical review of the manuscript. Sunday for contributing to the unruliness or delinquency of a minor, after police responded to a large house party in the 2700 block of St. They wrote an interesting paper that I just came across titled, "How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists. Minor revision, no need for further review : Revised before further review : Rejected or submitted for other publication : Opinion of First Review member : Pass : Pass : Return for revision, no need for further review : Return for revision before further review : Determined by editor : Minor revision, no need for further review. It is free of charge. This paper focuses on soil solution Zn and pH dynamics during phytoextraction. If you address the reviewers’ concerns satisfactorily, your paper stands a fair chance of getting accepted. Recommending Revision. CRE form 2 notes. Paper forms will not be accepted after November 2019. docx), Word paper template. It’s important that you state your topic in a nuanced way because it provides the context of your essay. Updated proposed wording after initial feedback from Jens Mauer. Some of Salmond's supporters have claimed the documentary was an attempt to retry him after he had been acquitted. For more details, see App Store Connect Help. – Accept with minor revision – Major revision (rare cases) – Reject • EIC makes final decision • Overall turn-around time: 6 to 12 months • Rule of thumb: 30% additional work beyond a CVPR/ICCV/ECCV paper. Minor revision does not guarantee acceptance after revision; address. The journal clearly said that the paper was accepted, subject to minor amendments and even went on to mention tentative publication dates. A Research Advance can be submitted by some or all of the authors of the original paper and/or researchers who were not involved in the original paper. In that case the paper will be rejected, if it ever comes back in the first place. Revised, sent to one old and one new reviewer. To increase your chances of success, you should target a more suitable journal based on the initial reviewer/editor comments. Paper rejection due to the lack of novelty. paper, 291 (94. If a question needs that. Here we focus on how to deal with reviewer comments. Good writers also understand that revision is an ongoing process, not necessarily something that you do only after your first draft is complete. In the case of rejection, clearly articulate the reasons for rejection helping the author to write a better or more fitting paper next time. I don't like the idea of sending the same paper to different journals hoping that someone will publish it, and I rarely resubmit a rejected paper elsewhere. That's easy; you submit it to another journal. The URL of the current page will be sent with your feedback. The presence of serious problems after a second revision suggests that the author is incapable of fixing the problems, in which case it is often appropriate to recommend final rejection. Rejected by Quarterly Journal of Economics: “The QJE turndown of the paper, influential as it became soon after publication, was perhaps due to the luck of the draw which all of us face as authors, sometimes driving us to distraction when the referees appear to be tendentious and capricious. Answer: Yes after fulfillment of prescribed conditions. The contents of the Federal Register are required to be judicially noticed (44 U. When Major Revisions Are Required after Your Thesis or Dissertation Exam Anticipating the inevitability of revisions after the final examination of a thesis or dissertation may be a wise strategy for any postgraduate student, but no candidate wants to think about the possibility of major revisions at so late a stage in the degree process. The Royal Society of Chemistry is committed to investigating and addressing the barriers and biases which face women in the chemical sciences. Use ICD-10 Now! ICD-10 Implementation Date: October 1, 2015 Code services provided on or after Oct 1, 2015 with ICD-10 Code services provided before Oct 1, 2015 with ICD-9, even if you submit the claim after Oct 1, 2015 The ICD-10 transition is a mandate that applies to all parties covered by HIPAA, not just providers who bill Medicare or Medicaid. If your return is rejected, you will be able to go into your account and make the necessary changes and re-submit your return. In the case of conditional acceptance, the required revisions will be clearly indicated. 2015 : 02/16/16 : American Political Thought : Ref Reject : 2 : 2 : 4 : Speedy. I remember when I got the reviews back from the first big paper that I submitted. I submitted my second paper through ScholarOne this Wednesday. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. If you are applying from outside the U. Finally, the numerical example (Sect. The final version of the manuscript is read by the editor before it is sent to publication. Coordination of voting system security activities with use of requirements payments and election administration requirements under Help America Vote Act of 2002. I think it is extremely uncommon to get minor revisions only on a submitted journal, especially if it’s your first paper which has not been externally reviewed before. 5-magnitude earthquake jolted Ambon in Maluku on Thursday morning, according to the National Disaster Mitigation Agency (BNPB). After the 7-day period, free revisions become unavailable, and we will be able to propose only the paid option of a minor or major revision of your paper. Any paper will either be accepted (possibly with minor revisions), submitted to another evaluation (after a major revision) or rejected. See full list on authorservices. comments carefully (Daniel McGowan, Edanz, 2012) Very few manuscripts get accepted without the need for any revision. Thank you for a great overview. After further revision, the Handling Editor decided that the authors had made the paper understandable to the wider community and the paper was published. BIRMINGHAM: Detectives in Britain’s second city of Birmingham on Sunday launched a hunt for a knifeman who killed one and critically injured two in a series of random stabbings over several hours. Normalise the experience of rejection as something to be expected. HOW TO USE THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. After the refereeing process is complete, a handing editor makes a decision for acceptance or rejection. we are a patriot organization that believes in upholding the united states constitution. An untenured philosopher writes. Members of the Technical Papers Committee, typically your primary and secondary reviewers, will be assigned to each paper as referees for the revision cycle. Furthermore, after you submit a research paper to SIGMOD, you must await the response from SIGMOD and only re-submit elsewhere if your paper is rejected - or withdrawn at your request - from SIGMOD. Time taken and recommendation on publication—Reviewers recorded the time taken to review each paper and whether it should be published with no revision, published with minor revision, published with major revision, rejected, or other. Thank you for your consideration. Objective To evaluate the associations between personal use of permanent hair dyes and cancer risk and mortality. The paper is rejected and, even if revised, will not normally be reconsidered. Rejection after peer review: Dealing with this is a key skill required of any academic. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) has rejected Red Bull’s plea for the removal of trademark registered in the name of Dr. That's easy; you submit it to another journal. Your paper will become visible only after it has been assigned to an editor. They wrote an interesting paper that I just came across titled, "How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists. I have recently had a paper rejected with 2 Accepts and 1 Reject from a CORE A* conference. They ended up adding another author who rewrote the paper and made it much better after three rounds of revision - it ended up getting accepted after a long revision cycle. Accept with minor revision: This is when your manuscript is scientifically sound and well written with only a few revisions required to correct language and content. Articles may or may not be sent to reviewers after author revision, depending on whether the reviewer requested the revised version and the wishes of the editor. CRE Notes pdf;☆☛ Christian Religious Education Questions and Answers. But make sure you have a list of three or four other journals that it is also. Authors then have 90 days to complete the required revisions and return the manuscript. TMHP is a group of contractors under the leadership of Accenture. CRE question/answer. To be revised (major revision): preprints that you have to revise and resubmit from your Author pages. Authors should address the points raised by reviewers within a timeline provided by the Papers Chairs and submit the revised version for final approval. I made the changes and the editor has now rejected the paper after taking review of 2 new people. Revision indicates that a paper does not have major problems, and should be acceptable with some further work. Major revision: The manuscript might be published after major revision, but further review is necessary. I remember when I got the reviews back from the first big paper that I submitted. After the reviews are complete, dispositions may include “rejection without further submission,” “rejection with an opportunity to resubmit,” “major revision without a promise of acceptance,” “minor revision,” “acceptance subject to minor revision,” or “outright acceptance. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on. Example, "The paper is well written, presents new matter, and can be published with minor revisions: We hope the articles in this series have better prepared you for dealing with journal revision or rejection. Microsoft's Conference Management Toolkit is a hosted academic conference management system. The Secretary of State’s Office requires county clerks — through bipartisan teams of election judges — to physically find a specific number of ballots and check those paper results against the votes tabulated by the computers. Skip to main content 搜尋此網誌 Qjygtk. For minor suggestions, appease the editor or referee if the change does not lower the quality of the paper. The editor scrutinizes the submission with respect to its originality, quality and scope. fhtml 454978a0-fe81-45c0-8869-fec5b5e243d2. Not employ minors under 16 in door-to-door sales activity before 7 a. If the manuscript is not written by native English subject experts, then the journal might return it for major rewriting. Quality Assured (ISO Certified) We strive for customer satisfaction. The author needs to send the copyright form within 3 days after the acceptance. Setting and participants 117 200 women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of female nurses in the United States. This seems like a positive move since the paper is back out there and hopefully under review. I remember when I got the reviews back from the first big paper that I submitted. The agreement form signed by each author remains valid. Accept with major revision: This is when your manuscript is conditionally accepted provided the major changes in content or organization are made. Accept, but only after minor revisions. 201401221918 PK t”Æ?, ' PK ñ{†D content. For journals I have managed, the number of "major revision" papers that are eventually accepted stays solidly between 80-90%. A minor deficiency is one that in FDA’s judgment is minor in nature and can be easily remedied. 2%) requested a revision. Minor tweaks. One thing you can do in the future to speed the re-review process is include a cover letter with your revised manuscript that explains how you responded to. I'm in a similar situation at the moment. Thank you for a great overview. com and give me “edit” privileges so I can comment. A Research Advance can be submitted by some or all of the authors of the original paper and/or researchers who were not involved in the original paper. pdf posted on their manuscript submission pages for the deadline to request revision access and complete submission of revised files. Accept with minor revision: This is when your manuscript is scientifically sound and well written with only a few revisions required to correct language and content. All manuscripts for which minor revision was requested, and 73/86 (85%) manuscripts for which major revision was. If the same paper is found appearing or published in any other publication, the paper will be automatically rejected. Authors should submit back their revisions within 1 month in the case of minor revision, or 3 months in the case of major revision. I do “Read Aloud” action after completing other proof reading things just before publishing post. Finally, the numerical example (Sect. See full list on authorservices. This recommendation. A poorly prepared manuscript is a waste of time for a reviewer and will be rejected or returned to the authors for revision before review. All four responses to accept our article came from presumed predatory journals, 3 of which received the Word format and 1 that received the PDF format. Given the very poor quality of the papers, the most appropriate recommendation would have been rejection. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. Professor Henry W. The mean time from acceptance to publication was 242. Time taken and recommendation on publication—Reviewers recorded the time taken to review each paper and whether it should be published with no revision, published with minor revision, published with major revision, rejected, or other. If writing is still bad, if significant results are still missing, if significant comparisons are missing, etc. Minor revision: This is equivalent to conditional accept. 5 Illegible or Missing Text 3. Authors that have been asked to revise their preprints must attend to the requested modifications and provide a new version of their preprints within 1 month at most. 2008-01-26 (Editing a paper) - 31 A bunch of shots of a paper that Riccardo and I were working on, after I'd scribbled all over it in one of my editing passes. The author is informed by the Editor directly, and will send the revision to the original Editor together with a short summary about the modifications authors have made and author's response to reviewer's comments. Article rejected after revision Article rejected after revision. Was the rejection editorial (without review) or was your manuscript rejected after review by several experts? Here are some translations: The paper is not acceptable in its present form:This essentially means that the manuscript is likely to be accepted, subject to satisfactory revisions. BIRMINGHAM: Detectives in Britain’s second city of Birmingham on Sunday launched a hunt for a knifeman who killed one and critically injured two in a series of random stabbings over several hours. See full list on authorservices. If the revision is accepted as a poster or rejected then any future revision of it may not be resubmitted to any SIGMETRICS deadline within 12-months following the initial submission of the paper. Our The This. I had a paper that was rejected after a “Minor Revision”. Paper rejection due to the lack of novelty. The editors state that they couldn't publish the paper in its current form but feel it has merits and invited me to respond to the comments made and resubmit to the journal at that time. No Rejected but reason was not the course. Once you’ve submitted your app for review, you can view its status in the My Apps section of App Store Connect or on the App Store Connect App for iPhone and iPad. Manuscripts are screened for plagiarism before, during, and after publication, and if found they will be rejected at any stage of processing. If you address the reviewers' concerns satisfactorily, your paper stands a fair chance of getting accepted. To increase your chances of success, you should target a more suitable journal based on the initial reviewer/editor comments. After the manuscript deadline through several days prior to the event — File revision access may be requested by emailing [email protected] The editor scrutinizes the submission with respect to its originality, quality and scope. Ping Utility. These changes can usually be made quite quickly and it is unlikely we will need to send your revised article back to the reviewers. Rejection - The paper is not expected to be acceptable to EICS PACM, even after reasonable effort is spent on revision, and should be submitted to another venue. The second role is to recommend to the editor whether the manuscript should be accepted, rejected, or sent back for revision. The cornerstone of this is a thorough analysis of data regarding submissions, review and citations for Royal Society of Chemistry journals from January 2014 until Jul. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. After reviewing authority (People v. Accept with major revision: This is when your manuscript is conditionally accepted provided the major changes in content or organization are made. My paper on exit polls was rejected by the first peer review. Minor Revision - The minor revision should not go back to the reviewers. Need help? Bridge Trainings: Curriculog Originator or Curriculog Agenda Management; User Guides. The editors should to be contacted before resubmitting a previously rejected paper. Then I showed the editor's letter to my advisor. The author is informed by the Editor directly, and will send the revision to the original Editor together with a short summary about the modifications authors have made and author's response to reviewer's comments. The editors state that they couldn't publish the paper in its current form but feel it has merits and invited me to respond to the comments made and resubmit to the journal at that time. Consider after Minor Changes Publish Unaltered If the Academic Editor decides to “Reject,” the authors are sent any review reports that have been received and are notified that their manuscript will no longer be considered for publication in the journal. If the proposal requires major revision, as recommended by the reviewers, the author is kindly asked to make the recommended revisions or explain in a separate letter to the editor-in-chief or in the text of the article itself why the. pdf posted on their manuscript submission pages for the deadline to request revision access and complete submission of revised files. Finally, the numerical example (Sect. 1; bad reference assignment +* (bug 8688) Handle underscores/spaces in Special:Blockip and Special:Ipblocklist + in a consistent manner +* (bug 8701) Check database lock status when blocking/unblocking users +* ParserOptions and ParserOutput classes are now in their own files +* (bug 8708. 5-magnitude earthquake jolted Ambon in Maluku on Thursday morning, according to the National Disaster Mitigation Agency (BNPB). The first one to a total of 6 months but ultimately ended in an Accept (and my first scientific publication, yay!), now this second one has gone to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" in 4 days. After further revision, the Handling Editor decided that the authors had made the paper understandable to the wider community and the paper was published. 0 Content-Type: multipart/related. ’It’can’be’accepted’after’minor’revision. Resubmission of paper (after peer review) Nearly every published paper goes through at least one revision. The layout of these papers has to follow the guidelines for regular submissions, in particular, for these papers the limit of 12 pages applies. for Other forms- located in MyPark Registrar page (See. After reviewing authority (People v. Accenture administers Texas Medicaid and other state health-care programs on behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. 3 days (Minor Revision) and 27. They might say, as one editor did to me, that after reflection (and reviewing) the paper doesn't really fit our format. But it does not hurt to try. I was mad to have to deal with a rejection after such petty reviews. The paper previously published in other minor publications such as conference, workshop, seminar, or proceedings can be eligible for being reviewed and published in the Transactions. Paper Template in Word program. Manuscripts that are evaluated as of minor values for electronics engineers might be rarely accepted even though they report novel results. Having been used since at least the 16th century to refer to a prowler or a poacher (Oxford English Dictionary), the term stalker was initially used by media in the 20th century to describe people who pester and harass others, initially with specific reference to the harassment. Rejection of seminal Works by then unknown economists. Recommending Revision. The SAE has four primary categories to choose from: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, and Reject. 0 days (Major Revision) for third resubmissions. The second reviewer's concerns were basically that he believes that one of the databases used in the paper (which is used in many other studies published in this journal) is completely invalid, but to. Graph showing the combined priority indications (‘high’ or ‘low’) and the reviewer’s recommendations (minor revision, major revision, major revision with experiments, reject) of all reviewers’ reports of original papers submitted to Cardiovascular Research between 1995 and 1999. Time taken and recommendation on publication—Reviewers recorded the time taken to review each paper and whether it should be published with no revision, published with minor revision, published with major revision, rejected, or other. We reworked the rejected manuscript on the basis of the reviews, then submitted to Nucleic Acids Research. http://schemas. Now, let us focus particularly on 3 and 4. Accept as is, with minor editorial corrections if needed b. Payment will be confirmed. · Accept with minor changes · Accept with major changes · Reject. A CEP is granted or the applicant/holder is informed that the revision has been accepted, and the current CEP remains valid (see annex 2). It killed 68 people and caused about $125 billion in damage in Texas. In its petition, Red Bull. It was submitted to a second-tier eye journal, after being rejected from a top-tier diabetes journal. If u r confident try again with strong sop. They wrote an interesting paper that I just came across titled, "How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists. accept as regular paper after minor revision 是让你小修下,你修改就是了,返回后小修的基本就直接接收了的,没有换审稿人重新审稿一说,接收后出版的时候,具体是以short paper或者 regular paper对你无影响。. But it does not hurt to try. Minor or major revisions mean the paper needs some revision to be publishable, we would write about it on the horizon. I have submitted two manuscripts to Sci Reports. I primarily took these so I could show my students what I do to the writing of professional co-authors so they don't feel so bad when I scribble all over their work. LEGAL STATUS. Once the review comments and decision of the reviewers on the manuscript is received by the Editorial Office, the assigned Editor will be notified for further decision on the article as the required reviews are completed. – LevinsonTechnologies Apr 15 '15 at 21:28. Accept after major revision and re-evaluation (comments) d. Dear Sir, Madame, or Other: Enclosed is our latest version of MS #85-02-22-RRRRR, that is, the re-re-re-revised version of our paper. Good writers also understand that revision is an ongoing process, not necessarily something that you do only after your first draft is complete. Word paper template (. That's easy; you submit it to another journal. These changes can usually be made quite quickly and it is unlikely we will need to send your revised article back to the reviewers. Get unstuck. Accept with minor revision: This is when your manuscript is scientifically sound and well written with only a few revisions required to correct language and content. using track changes. You have received one recommendation for major and one for minor revisions. Accept with major revision: This is when your manuscript is conditionally accepted provided the major changes in content or organization are made. Setting and participants 117 200 women enrolled in the Nurses’ Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of female nurses in the United States. This way, your readers will have a clear understanding of what they are going to read about in the remainder of your paper. Possible decisions after review are: accept as is, minor revision, major revision, or reject. BIRMINGHAM: Detectives in Britain’s second city of Birmingham on Sunday launched a hunt for a knifeman who killed one and critically injured two in a series of random stabbings over several hours. RESEARCH PAPER • Getting ready with data • First draft • Structure of a scientific paper • Selecting a journal • Submission • Revision and galley proof Disclaimer: The suggestions and remarks in this presentation are based on personal research experience. Paper rejection due to the lack of novelty. Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review Rejected The comments of the anonymous reviewers will be forwarded to the authors, and when the authors are ready to submit their revised manuscript, read the comments of the editors and reviewers, and respond to them by telling what modifications they have made in their. Sometimes the news is fabulous -- publish as is! Sometimes the news is very good -- minor revision only needed. Authors should submit back their revisions within 1 month in the case of minor revision, 3 months in the case of major revision, and 4 months in the case of de novo resubmission. Revised, sent to one old and one new reviewer. But if your e-file is rejected, we'll tell you exactly why, and give you the steps to correct it. for Curriculum forms- located in My Park Curriculum Committee page (See Documents section). The author needs to send the copyright form within 3 days after the acceptance. A poorly prepared manuscript is a waste of time for a reviewer and will be rejected or returned to the authors for revision before review. military filing on your own behalf, you cannot currently file your Form N-600 online. I made the changes and the editor has now rejected the paper after taking review of 2 new people. In addition, when work is done, you can use your 14-30-day revision period, so that a writer will look into the final draft once again and make all the needed changes. As an added bonus, the “minor revision” is really minor – just shortening part of the discussion, and the targeted part really doesn’t do much for the paper itself anyway. Well, a minor revision means “I am almost happy with the paper”, i. First, papers going through review are a lot more likely to be accepted. Outright rejection can be recommended if the paper has following flaws-serious flaws in clinical report,-incorrect interpretation of data,-extensive plagiarism,-organizational or English usage flaws that prevent critical review of the manuscript. Sincerely,. Normalise the experience of rejection as something to be expected. The second reviewer asks for a change in the title and then offers 13 specific suggestions for punctuation, wording or emphasis. Like all CGF new submissions, the decision options after the first CGF review cycle typically include , , , and. Theoretical paper, – Accepted without change // Accepted after minor revision // Accepted after condensation // Reconsidered after major revision // Rejected. Make a rejection plan. The editor-in-charge would like to know your opinion on the resubmitted version. Azelia, one of Hermione's finest Shrews, was not very happy about the decision to stay and disagreed with Hermione rather openly. This registration waiver is only VALID FOR 2 YEARS AFTER RECEIPT AND FOR 1 (ONE) PERSON. Authors that have been asked to revise their preprints must attend to the requested modifications and provide a new version of their preprints within 1 month at most. Liton Biswas on September 15, 2013 11:20 am. Major Revision : Papers in this category are considered to be promising but need additional work (e. She decided that the Shrews should stay though they were all on the brink of starvation. ZIP 188,398 03-27-97 Navsearch V1. They wrote an interesting paper that I just came across titled, "How Are the Mighty Fallen: Rejected Classic Articles by Leading Economists. This usually takes 1-3 days. Where improvements are needed, a recommendation for major or minor revision is typical. Objective To evaluate the associations between personal use of permanent hair dyes and cancer risk and mortality. Dont listen to consultant he doesn't wanna work on ur file after rejection. Hundreds. CRE form 4 notes. · Accept with minor changes · Accept with major changes · Reject. The reviews of the original version came with conclusions "Accept after major revision" (rev A) and "Accept after minor revision" (rev B). the reasons behind the rejection. For minor suggestions, appease the editor or referee if the change does not lower the quality of the paper. ) If your paper needed some tweaks, but mostly looked in shape, then it was then it was common to get this decision: "Accept With Minor Revisions. Rejected by Quarterly Journal of Economics: “The QJE turndown of the paper, influential as it became soon after publication, was perhaps due to the luck of the draw which all of us face as authors, sometimes driving us to distraction when the referees appear to be tendentious and capricious. The editor read the paper and sent me some. Blenheim High School is a secondary school with academy status located at Longmead Road, Epsom, Surrey, England, that opened in 1997. Papers having two reviewers’ recommendations to accept and minor revision have much greater chance of acceptance (more than 98%) than papers receiving two reviewers’ recommendations that include a major revision and a reject or two rejections (which results in an acceptance rate of less than 5%): (Figure 1). PREAMBLE: ARTICLE VIII - FINANCE: ARTICLE I - BILL OF RIGHTS: ARTICLE IX - REVENUE. The submitted conference papers are subject to double blind peer review. The economic consequences of plague: lessons for the age of Covid-19. Definitions. The abstract might better differentiate among the three categories. One thing you can do in the future to speed the re-review process is include a cover letter with your revised manuscript that explains how you responded to. The work search requirement will be reinstated on September 8, 2020 for all claimants except as noted below. Many after him have proudly identified their protests as acts of civil disobedience and have been treated by their societies – sometimes temporarily, sometimes indefinitely – as its enemies. The editor scrutinizes the submission with respect to its originality, quality and scope. HOW TO USE THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. often doom the paper once the study has been completed. And resubmitted papers are published without another full process of peer-review but subjected to acceptable explanations for the points raised by referees. Decisions can be three types like accepted without revision, resubmit with major/minor revisions, rejected. In many journals, it's either a revision or no revision: accept. It is free of charge. These are not time limited like minor revisions (currently 2 months for my journal), so you can take your time to make the changes. Ping Utility. 2%) requested a revision. Not employ any minor in any door-to-door sales activity during school hours except where specifically permitted 8. Then I showed the editor's letter to my advisor. Accept with major revision: This is when your manuscript is conditionally accepted provided the major changes in content or organization are made. HOWEVER, an editor can say: "I reject this paper, but you should go through a major revision and submit a new/different paper. In cases where only minor revisions are recommended, the author is usually requested to revise the paper before it is referred to the external editor. Again the criticisms were mainly technical – one reviewer wrote after a period of 6 months that because we had not mentioned that Likert scales produced ordinal as opposed to interval data, he/she refused to read any further than the first paragraph. CRE form 4 notes. For papers 'accepted after minor revision', papers are returned to corresponding authors for minor revision. Giving the tracking number is optional but helpful for us. I was mad to have to deal with a rejection after such petty reviews. The appropriate revision date is printed on the cover of each volume. Minor revision Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for Journal of Applied Physics. — A warrant will be issued for Atlas Miladin sometime after 1:28 a. " I got that letter on a paper about a year ago,. Author need to deposit publication fee within 3 days after the payment request. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of. Their comments seemed minor and easy to fix, but the paper was rejected b/c, the contribution was more incremental and they don't have a lot of space, so they prioritize papers that stand to make the most substantial advances in pushing the field forward. If the same paper is found appearing or published in any other publication, the paper will be automatically rejected. pdf), Text File (. If you get a rejection at this point, don’t get upset. Presenting authors should check the Revisions_PaperDataUpdates. Resubmission of paper (after peer review) Nearly every published paper goes through at least one revision. Blenheim High School is a secondary school with academy status located at Longmead Road, Epsom, Surrey, England, that opened in 1997. Revised, sent to one old and one new reviewer. You might also like. Some journals automatically send out everything to be reviewed by other scholars. An editor once appointed 2 new referees after my paper went through a major followed by a minor revision from the first 2 referees. BIRMINGHAM: Detectives in Britain’s second city of Birmingham on Sunday launched a hunt for a knifeman who killed one and critically injured two in a series of random stabbings over several hours. At least 19 people have died after a 6. Revision 1. I was mad to have to deal with a rejection after such petty reviews. I do “Read Aloud” action after completing other proof reading things just before publishing post. How should you handle rejection? There are several possible reasons for a rejection and it is important to read the decision letter carefully to establish whether it was with or without peer review. You may also choose to state whether you opt in or out of the post-revision review too. Here we focus on how to deal with reviewer comments. Hi all, I am wondering how the minor revision sent back to review finally worked out. Use ICD-10 Now! ICD-10 Implementation Date: October 1, 2015 Code services provided on or after Oct 1, 2015 with ICD-10 Code services provided before Oct 1, 2015 with ICD-9, even if you submit the claim after Oct 1, 2015 The ICD-10 transition is a mandate that applies to all parties covered by HIPAA, not just providers who bill Medicare or Medicaid. August 2019 - Consultation Paper on Codification of General Waivers and Principles relating to IPOs and Listed Issuers and Minor Rule Amendments Consultation Paper Questionnaire. After contacting him, I was told that he. 2008-01-26 (Editing a paper) - 31 A bunch of shots of a paper that Riccardo and I were working on, after I'd scribbled all over it in one of my editing passes. Sincerely,. This suggests two possible further lines of research. Reviewer’1’’! General’’ The’paper’is’wellwritten. often doom the paper once the study has been completed. Ther Apher Dial. All manuscripts for which minor revision was requested, and 73/86 (85%) manuscripts for which major revision was. I had a paper that was rejected after a “Minor Revision”. The Editor-in-Chief will make the final decision and communicate that to the authors. Some authors may be encouraged to resubmit upon rejection, which may be an alternative to requesting a. In the case of rejection, the author will be given specific reasons related to the criteria enumerated above. I have recently had a paper rejected with 2 Accepts and 1 Reject from a CORE A* conference. Applying it to durable goods, such as clothing or appliances, is a stretch. I primarily took these so I could show my students what I do to the writing of professional co-authors so they don't feel so bad when I scribble all over their work. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. A poorly prepared manuscript is a waste of time for a reviewer and will be rejected or returned to the authors for revision before review. Paper rejected after 3 rounds of revisions! The paper was accepted with minor revisions at another equivalent journal. 3 days (Minor Revision) and 27. U can get approval. ! If you find 0 critical defect, 10 major defects and 21 minor defects, the products are accepted. A daunting truth about the. August 2019 - Consultation Paper on Codification of General Waivers and Principles relating to IPOs and Listed Issuers and Minor Rule Amendments Consultation Paper Questionnaire. Then a spell check, and a re-read front to back, and then, after a cuppa, read it again. Review status. It’s important that you state your topic in a nuanced way because it provides the context of your essay. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) has rejected Red Bull’s plea for the removal of trademark registered in the name of Dr. Two problems that are especially unfortunate for authors and potential readers alike are failing to revise and resubmit a manu-script after initial peer review and never preparing a full manuscript in the first place, after presentation of the work in abstract form. In that case the paper will be rejected, if it ever comes back in the first place. They raised questions which had they read the paper they would have the answer too. The second role is to recommend to the editor whether the manuscript should be accepted, rejected, or sent back for revision. 2019] Where, after an appeal has been filed and before decision by the Board, an applicant withdraws the appeal after the period for reply to the final rejection has expired, the application is to be considered abandoned as of the date on which the appeal was withdrawn unless there are allowed claims in the case. Rejection after peer review: Dealing with this is a key skill required of any academic. Presenting authors should check the Revisions_PaperDataUpdates. The new, enlarged and re-engineered 888cc T-plane triple motor lacks only on paper (power and torque are now among the lowest in the class) – but on the road it has all the overtaking punch of its rivals, just a gear lower. Like all CGF new submissions, the decision options after the first CGF review cycle typically include , , , and. After you submit your paper, the editor, the managing editor and/or the editorial team decide whether to consider the paper for review or not. Sample Response to Revision Request. Journal editors will often send a ‘rejection’ email that also includes an option to re-submit (‘we would consider a revised version of this paper if you are able to take the comments of the reviewers into account’). The first is to inform the authors about the strengths and weaknesses of the submitted paper and to suggest ways that the study could be or could have been improved. Title: Using-revision-tracking-new-Word Author: Geoff Hart Created Date: 2/5/2016 10:22:08 PM. If your paper is a revision of a paper that was previously submitted to SIGGRAPH or SIGGRAPH 2013, please see the Resubmission section. If you have followed the guidelines above, it should make the re-review process more straightforward: If you said minor revision and they addressed your minor issues - accept. So, I said in my submission letter that it had been rejected by Science. Paper rejected after 3 rounds of revisions! The paper was accepted with minor revisions at another equivalent journal. In that case the paper will be rejected, if it ever comes back in the first place. 0 Content-Type: multipart/related. In 1763 Great Britain defeated France in the Seven Years War (1754-1763) and the two combatants signed the Treaty of Paris in the same year. for Other forms- located in MyPark Registrar page (See. Works With DOS Win 3. Applying it to durable goods, such as clothing or appliances, is a stretch. A policy yes?but more exactly that part of a policy defined in Chapter 5 as a program. CRE question/answer. Guido Alfani traces the long-term effects of previous pandemics, and finds that a region's starting conditions are key to economic outcomes – and some consequences are still with us 600 years after the Black Death. You will be provided with note-taking paper. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited. The distinction between policy and program is an important one when speaking of implementation. I e-mailed the editor and said, “These reviews don’t look so bad. Instant access to millions of Study Resources, Course Notes, Test Prep, 24/7 Homework Help, Tutors, and more. Authors are so notified. Reviewers are given 3 weeks to review the major revision. The presence of serious problems after a second revision suggests that the author is incapable of fixing the problems, in which case it is often appropriate to recommend final rejection. Members of the Technical Papers Committee, typically your primary and secondary reviewers, will be assigned to each paper as referees for the revision cycle. The paper is rejected and, even if revised, will not normally be reconsidered. The link to the preprint remains while the paper is actively under consideration by the journal, including while the author is adding any revision. Harvey dumped up to 50 inches (1. Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review Rejected The comments of the anonymous reviewers will be forwarded to the authors, and when the authors are ready to submit their revised manuscript, read the comments of the editors and reviewers, and respond to them by telling what modifications they have made in their. Thu, Sep 03, 2020 - 7:49 PM. But if your e-file is rejected, we'll tell you exactly why, and give you the steps to correct it. Manuscripts that fail to pass the initial screening will be rejected without further review. An effective service with the customer-oriented approach is our fundamental goal. tex file if the paper is prepared by using Latex program with author names and institutions. The Connecticut General Assembly 2020 Regular Session convened February 5th and adjourned May 8th. CRE Notes pdf;☆☛ Christian Religious Education Questions and Answers. Disable opposite day, print and save this document now. LEGAL STATUS. Members of the Technical Papers Committee, typically your primary and secondary reviewers, will be assigned to each paper as referees for the revision cycle. I recommend this paper to: a. 2019] Where, after an appeal has been filed and before decision by the Board, an applicant withdraws the appeal after the period for reply to the final rejection has expired, the application is to be considered abandoned as of the date on which the appeal was withdrawn unless there are allowed claims in the case. After the reviews are complete, dispositions may include “rejection without further submission,” “rejection with an opportunity to resubmit,” “major revision without a promise of acceptance,” “minor revision,” “acceptance subject to minor revision,” or “outright acceptance. This letter is archived at the University of Pennsylvania Humor Page are the answers. Accept with minor revision: This is when your manuscript is scientifically sound and well written with only a few revisions required to correct language and content. This is a d. After the final review process if the paper will be accepted we will send a payment request to the author. I did understand the risks of being rejected when I made the submission, the problem is that I got back some set of reviews that are not applicable (let alone constructive) to my work. If the same paper is found appearing or published in any other publication, the paper will be automatically rejected. Inno Setup 5. Wen u reapply u address all points mentioned in rejection remarks in caips. See full list on edas. The Note 20 Ultra also sports the OneUI 2. Also, if two of the reviewers recommend rejecting the manuscript, the rejection is immediate. The Court rejected the County’s defense that the public trust doctrine does not apply to groundwater pumped beyond the Scott River’s zone of adjudication. 10 Does the paper use SI and IUPAC terminology and follow the journal style ? 11 Are sources of support, such as industry, acknowledged ? 12 Is the level of English sufficient or does it need revision ? TITLE 13 Is the ‘Title’ in an appropriate length ? 14 Should the ‘Title’ be changed - to better reflect the novelty of the content ?. How to publish your paper rejected by Demography in the Journal of Family Psychology February 22, 2014 at 11:53am October 27, 2016 by Claire Kamp Dush One of the best things about being in an interdisciplinary department is that you can publish where you want – there is not a group of “top journals” that you have to push your papers in. Many after him have proudly identified their protests as acts of civil disobedience and have been treated by their societies – sometimes temporarily, sometimes indefinitely – as its enemies. LEGAL STATUS. While the OS is great on most fronts, there was one major issue I found with the Note 20 Ultra. CRE form 4 notes. Recorded the poll results of review in San Diego. The author can then reply to each point in turn. 0 In 1711 a law was passed in Pennsylvania prohibiting the importation of slaves, but it was rejected by the Council in England. I would also recommend letting that email you receive sit in your inbox for 1-2 days – just to give you room to breathe and deal with more objectively, with less emotion. Giving the tracking number is optional but helpful for us. The editor scrutinizes the submission with respect to its originality, quality and scope. And here are two screenshots to show you how: Make sure that every paper you submit has your name, the class number, and your email address. My guess is that this would be counted as a rejection, despite the request for revision and resubmission, and the later acceptance with minor revisions of the same paper would be counted as an acceptance. In 2000 he left to Lazio and become the very best scorer with 26 goals in 2000/2001 Serie A season. This morning, I got an email with the far more elusive “accepted with minor revision” decision for a paper. 1 The Four Major River Valleys. In addition to the great instructions above, you can also edit the revision number in the "Version" box (after doing the above). Minor revision: This is equivalent to conditional accept. Harvey dumped up to 50 inches (1. the authors just need to add a couple of articles in the references or correct something that’s unclear in the text or badly phrased. This is one of the best situation. ZIP 188,398 03-27-97 Navsearch V1. Rejected by Quarterly Journal of Economics: “The QJE turndown of the paper, influential as it became soon after publication, was perhaps due to the luck of the draw which all of us face as authors, sometimes driving us to distraction when the referees appear to be tendentious and capricious. I made the changes and the editor has now rejected the paper after taking review of 2 new people. This is a definitive rejection, without the possibility of revision and resubmission. You will be provided with note-taking paper. Should authors be requested by the editor to revise the text, the revised version should be submitted within 3 months for a major revision or 1 month for a minor revision. Minor or major revisions mean the paper needs some revision to be publishable, we would write about it on the horizon. If the proposal requires major revision, as recommended by the reviewers, the author is kindly asked to make the recommended revisions or explain in a separate letter to the editor-in-chief or in the text of the article itself why the. Contributions via GitHub: Thanks to ElSanchez, DRON and jogo- for their contributions for respectively Unicode input source support, improved image stretching, and various improvements. Paper forms will not be accepted after November 2019. After making a preliminary decision and adding comments to the author, this is passed on to the coeditor (typically the one who began the process) for further review and occasional discussion before finalizing it to send to the author. The women were free of cancer at baseline, reported information on personal use of permanent. By the end of the suite. This meta review should provide clear constructive suggestions for the authors on how to improve the paper depending on the decision: for minor or major revisions, clarify what revisions are expected; for rejected papers, clarify the main reasons why the paper is being rejected and what the authors might want to improve for a better shot for a. Reviewers are given 3 weeks to review the major revision. Accepted for publication after substantial revision and additional review Rejected The comments of the anonymous reviewers will be forwarded to the authors, and when the authors are ready to submit their revised manuscript, read the comments of the editors and reviewers, and respond to them by telling what modifications they have made in their. We recommend that authors who receive requests for major or minor revisions follow the advice of the reviewers and associate editor if they believe that this advice will. I had a paper that was rejected after a “Minor Revision”. In case of multiple authors, one (1) author only can use the registration waiver. Consider after Minor Changes Publish Unaltered If the Academic Editor decides to “Reject,” the authors are sent any review reports that have been received and are notified that their manuscript will no longer be considered for publication in the journal. datacontract. My paper on exit polls was rejected by the first peer review. —In subsection II, added a discussion of the web-based ADS; revised to clarify that a corrected ADS filed after a final rejection or allowance is not entered as a matter of right; revised to clarify that when no applicant is identified in the applicant information section of a properly signed ADS, a corrected ADS must identify a new applicant. I have recently had a paper rejected with 2 Accepts and 1 Reject from a CORE A* conference. – Accept with minor revision – Major revision (rare cases) – Reject • EIC makes final decision • Overall turn-around time: 6 to 12 months • Rule of thumb: 30% additional work beyond a CVPR/ICCV/ECCV paper.